Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
13-6100•Vinnie Dunnell Williams v. R. A. Purdue
13-6100Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit23.05.2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-6100
VINNIE DUNNELL WILLIAMS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
R. A. PURDUE,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh,
District Judge. (3:12-cv-00065-GMG-JSK)
Submitted: May 17, 2013 Decided: May 23, 2013
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Vinnie Dunnell Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Helen Campbell
Altmeyer, Jarod James Douglas, Assistant United States
Attorneys, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Vinnie Dunnell Williams, a federal prisoner, appeals
the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the
magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241
(West 2006 & Supp. 2012) petition. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant
leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Williams v. Purdue, No. 3:12-cv-
00065-GMG-JSK (N.D. W. Va. Jan. 18, 2013). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.