Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
13-6077•Calvin Lewis Davis v. Dr. Richard O. Broadwell, Iii
13-6077Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit03.09.2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-6077
CALVIN LEWIS DAVIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DR. RICHARD O. BROADWELL, III,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:11-ct-03003-FL)
Submitted: August 29, 2013 Decided: September 3, 2013
Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Calvin Lewis Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Kelly Street Brown,
Martin Rossie Jernigan, Elizabeth Pharr McCullough, YOUNG, MOORE
& HENDERSON, PA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Calvin Lewis Davis appeals the district court’s order
granting Defendant’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motion and
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) civil rights action.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Davis v. Broadwell, No. 5:11-ct-03003-FL (E.D.N.C.
Jan. 11, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.