Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
13-4526•United States of America v. Duane McAtee
13-4526Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit21.10.2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-4526
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
DUANE MCATEE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. John Preston Bailey,
Chief District Judge. (5:13-cr-00017-JPB-JES-1)
Submitted: January 3, 2014 Decided: October 21, 2014
Before KING, GREGORY, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Katy J. Cimino, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Kristen M.
Leddy, Research and Writing Specialist, Clarksburg, West
Virginia, for Appellant. William J. Ihlenfeld, II, United
States Attorney, Paul T. Camilletti, Assistant United States
Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Duane McAtee appeals his six-month sentence entered
pursuant to his conviction for contempt of court. McAtee contends
that his sentence is procedurally and substantively unreasonable.
We dismiss the appeal as moot.
On January 6, 2014, while this appeal was pending, McAtee
was released from incarceration. We may address sua sponte whether
an issue on appeal presents “a live case or controversy . . . since
mootness goes to the heart of the Article III jurisdiction of the
courts.” Friedman’s, Inc. v. Dunlap, 290 F.3d 191, 197 (4th Cir.
2002) (internal quotation marks omitted). Because McAtee has
already served his term of imprisonment and has not identified any
collateral consequences of it, there is no longer any live
controversy regarding the length of his confinement. Therefore,
his challenge to his sentence is moot. See United States v. Hardy,
545 F.3d 280, 283-84 (4th Cir. 2008).
Accordingly, McAtee’s appeal is dismissed as moot. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.