Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
13-2514•Keith B. Shamberger v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; AMERICA’S SERVICING COMPANY, d/b/a ASC; SHAPIRO BROWN & ALT, LLP
13-2514Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit21.04.2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-2514
KEITH B. SHAMBERGER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; AMERICA’S SERVICING COMPANY, d/b/a
ASC; SHAPIRO BROWN & ALT, LLP,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr.,
District Judge. (3:13-cv-00645-JAG)
Submitted: April 17, 2014 Decided: April 21, 2014
Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Keith B. Shamberger, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Keith B. Shamberger appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his pro se complaint against Defendants after a
review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2012). We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Shamberger
v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 3:13-cv-00645-JAG (E.D. Va. Nov.
13, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.