Brian Warch; Samuel Thames v. International Longshoremen’s Association, Local 333

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-2443
BRIAN WARCH; SAMUEL THAMES,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
and
ABRAM SEWELL; RODNEY STITH,
Plaintiffs,
v.
INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMEN’S ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 333;
STEAMSHIP TRADE ASSOCIATION; MTC; PORTS AMERICA,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
AMERICAN SUGAR REFINING, INC.; CERES TERMINALS, INC.;
MID-ATLANTIC TERMINALS/WWL; TARTAN TERMINALS, INC.,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Susan K. Gauvey, Magistrate Judge.
(1:12-cv-00044-SKG)
Submitted: April 28, 2014 Decided: May 2, 2014
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Brian Warch, Samuel Thames, Appellants Pro Se. Jennifer Lynn
Stair, TERRASA & STAIR, PA, Baltimore, Maryland; Michael J.
Collins, MICHAEL J. COLLINS, PC, Highland, Maryland, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Brian Warch and Samuel Thames appeal the magistrate
judge’s order* dismissing in part and denying relief in part on
their civil action for breach of duty of fair representation
against Defendant International Longshoremen’s Association,
Local 333, and challenging employment practices of Defendants
Steamship Trade Association, MTC, and Ports America and the
magistrate judge’s order denying their Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e)
motion to alter or amend judgment. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the magistrate judge. Warch v. Int’l
Longshoremen’s Ass’n, Local 333, No. 1:12-cv-00044-SKG (D. Md.
Mar. 27 & Oct. 29, 2013). We deny the motion to intervene and
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* The parties in this case consented to the jurisdiction of
the magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1) (2012).

-- 3 of 3 --