Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
13-2344•Randolph S. Koch v. United States Merit Systems Protection Board
13-2344Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit03.07.2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-2344
RANDOLPH S. KOCH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD; SUSAN TSUI
GRUNDMANN, In her Official Capacity as Chairman, U.S. Merit
Systems Protection Board,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District
Judge. (8:12-cv-01590-DKC)
Submitted: June 24, 2014 Decided: July 3, 2014
Before SHEDD, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Randolph S. Koch, Appellant Pro Se. Alex Gordon, Assistant
United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Randolph S. Koch appeals the district court’s order
dismissing this employment discrimination action pursuant to
Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Koch v. U.S. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.
No. 8:12-cv-01590-DKC (D. Md. Aug. 2, 2013). We grant leave to
proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.