Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
13-2285•Joseph Kirzhner v. Purepower Technologies LLC
13-2285Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit15.04.2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-2285
JOSEPH KIRZHNER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PUREPOWER TECHNOLOGIES LLC,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Margaret B. Seymour, Senior
District Judge. (3:12-cv-01802-MBS)
Submitted: March 31, 2014 Decided: April 15, 2014
Before KING, GREGORY, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph Kirzhner, Appellant Pro Se. Jade Cobb Murray, LITTLER
MENDELSON PC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Joseph Kirzhner appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
granting summary judgment to PurePOWER Technologies LLC on his
complaint asserting violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights
Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West
2006 & Supp. 2013). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Kirzhner v. PurePOWER Technologies LLC,
No. 3:12-cv-01802-MBS (D.S.C. Sept. 23, 2013). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.