Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
13-2233•Minh Vu Hoang v. GARY A. ROSEN, Trustee -
13-2233Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit25.02.2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-2233
MINH VU HOANG,
Debtor - Appellant,
THANH HOANG,
Debtor,
v.
GARY A. ROSEN,
Trustee – Appellee,
and
U.S. TRUSTEE, Greenbelt, 11,
Trustee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District
Judge. (8:12-cv-03184-DKC; 05-21078)
Submitted: February 20, 2014 Decided: February 25, 2014
Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Minh Vu Hoang, Appellant Pro Se.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Minh Vu Hoang appeals the district court’s order
affirming the bankruptcy court’s orders granting the trustee’s
turnover motion and denying her motion in limine to exclude
certain expert testimony. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Hoang v. Rosen, No. 8:12-cv-
03184-DKC (D. Md. filed Sept. 6, 2013, and filed Oct. 6, 2013).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.