Sandra Lee Barcus v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-2201
SANDRA LEE BARCUS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge.
(1:12-cv-00724-CCB)
Submitted: February 27, 2014 Decided: March 18, 2014
Before KING, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sandra Lee Barcus, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Bess, VEDDER PRICE,
PC, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Sandra Lee Barcus appeals the district court’s order
granting Sears, Roebuck & Co.’s motion for summary judgment on
her claim of quid pro quo sexual harassment, in violation of 42
U.S.C. § 2000e. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Barcus v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., No.
1:12-cv-00724-CCB (D. Md. Aug. 28, 2013). Additionally, we deny
Barcus’ request for leave to amend her complaint to add
additional employment discrimination claims. See Cozzarelli v.
Inspire Pharm., Inc., 549 F.3d 618, 630-31 (4th Cir. 2008). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --