Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
13-2143•Charles Green v. Deputy Sheriff Tom Hodges
13-2143Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit02.07.2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-2143
CHARLES GREEN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DEPUTY SHERIFF TOM HODGES,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
RICHLAND COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; SHERIFF LEON LOTT,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (3:10-cv-03162-JFA)
Submitted: June 26, 2014 Decided: July 2, 2014
Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Green, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Lindemann, DAVIDSON &
LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Charles Green appeals a jury verdict denying relief on
his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the
record, including the transcript of the two-day jury trial, and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. Green v.
Deputy Tom Hodges, No. 3:10-cv-03162-JFA (D.S.C. filed Aug. 27,
2013; entered Aug. 28, 2013). We deny Green’s motions for
appointment of counsel and to compel disclosure of evidence. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.