Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
13-1883•Sebastian Bustos Ayon v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
13-1883Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit04.03.2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1883
SEBASTIAN BUSTOS AYON,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals.
Submitted: February 21, 2014 Decided: March 4, 2014
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Daniel G. Anna, ANNA & ANNA, P.C., Media, Pennsylvania, for
Petitioner. Stuart F. Delery, Greg D. Mack, Kathryn L.
Deangelis, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Sebastian Bustos Ayon, a native and citizen of Mexico,
petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals (“Board”) dismissing his appeal from the immigration
judge’s denial of his requests for asylum, withholding of
removal and withholding under the Convention Against Torture.
We have thoroughly reviewed the record, including the transcript
of Ayon’s merits hearing, and his supporting affidavit and
evidence. We conclude that the record evidence does not compel
a ruling contrary to any of the Board’s factual findings, see 8
U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012), and that substantial evidence
supports the Board’s decision. See INS v. Elias–Zacarias, 502
U.S. 478, 481 (1992).
Accordingly, we deny the petition for review finding
that substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision. See In
re: Ayon (B.I.A. June 13, 2013). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.