Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
13-1880•Diane Williams v. Commonwealth of Virginia, State Board of Elections
13-1880Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit29.04.2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1880
DIANE WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS; NANCY
RODRIQUES, in her Individual Capacity as Secretary of the
State Board of Elections,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 13-2277
DIANE WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS; NANCY
RODRIQUES, in her Individual Capacity as Secretary of the
State Board of Elections,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:11-cv-00863-HEH-DJN)
Submitted: April 22, 2014 Decided: April 29, 2014
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Before NIEMEYER, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Janipher W. Robinson, ROBINSON & GREENE, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellant. Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, II, Attorney General of
Virginia, Wesley G. Russell, Jr., Deputy Attorney General,
Ronald N. Regnery, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond,
Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Diane Williams appeals the district court’s orders
denying her Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(6) motions to reconsider its
earlier order granting summary judgment against her and
dismissing her civil action alleging employment discrimination.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Williams v. Va., State Bd. of Elections, No. 3:11-cv-
00863-HEH-DJN (E.D. Va. June 13, 2013; Oct. 4, 2013). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.