Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
13-1621•Derek N. Jarvis v. the Christmas Attic
13-1621Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit22.07.2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1621
DEREK N. JARVIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
THE CHRISTMAS ATTIC,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior
District Judge. (1:12-cv-01010-CMH-TRJ)
Submitted: July 18, 2013 Decided: July 22, 2013
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Derek N. Jarvis, Appellant Pro Se. Victor M. Glasberg, VICTOR
M. GLASBERG & ASSOCIATES, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Derek N. Jarvis appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to reconsider the dismissal of his civil
action. The district court denied the motion to reconsider for
the reasons stated in its March 22, 2013 order. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jarvis
v. The Christmas Attic, No. 1:12-cv-01010-CMH-TRJ (E.D. Va.
filed Mar. 22 and entered Mar. 26, 2013; May 6, 2013). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.