William Leslie Barrett, Sr. v. USA-Social Security; KATHLEEN SEBELIUS; USA/Eric Holder

13-1589Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit26.09.2013

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1589
WILLIAM LESLIE BARRETT, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
USA-Social Security; KATHLEEN SEBELIUS; USA/Eric Holder,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:10-cv-00469-BO)
Submitted: September 24, 2013 Decided: September 26, 2013
Before NIEMEYER and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON,
Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William L. Barrett, Appellant Pro Se. Edward D. Gray, Assistant
United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
William Leslie Barrett, Sr., appeals the district
court’s orders dismissing his civil complaint for failure to
state a claim and denying his motion for reconsideration. On
appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the
Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Barrett’s
informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district
court’s disposition, Barrett has forfeited appellate review of
the court’s orders. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Barrett v. United States, No.
5:10-cv-00469-BO (E.D.N.C. Feb. 20, 2013; Apr. 24, 2013). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.