Evelyn R. Sinkler v. Conseco Life Insurance Company

13-1549Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit14.06.2013

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1549
EVELYN R. SINKLER,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
CONSECO LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
CNO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior
District Judge. (1:12-cv-00642-CMH-JFA)
Submitted: June 10, 2013 Decided: June 14, 2013
Before GREGORY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Evelyn R. Sinkler, Appellant Pro Se. David Drake Hudgins,
HUDGINS LAW FIRM, Alexandria, Virginia; Andrea Rose Simmons,
S.K. HUFFER & ASSOCIATES, PC, Carmel, Indiana, for Appellee.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Evelyn R. Sinkler appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellee on Sinkler’s
claims regarding a disability income rider to her life insurance
policy. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Sinkler v. Conseco Life Ins. Co., No.
1:12-cv-00642-CMH-JFA (E.D. Va. Apr. 12, 2013). We also deny as
moot the Appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal as prematurely
filed. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.