Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
13-1305•Sheila E. Brown v. Berkley Staffing, LLC; Metro Machine Corp.; General Dynamics Corp.
13-1305Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit26.09.2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1305
SHEILA E. BROWN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BERKLEY STAFFING, LLC; METRO MACHINE CORP.; GENERAL DYNAMICS
CORP.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District
Judge. (2:12-cv-00564-MSD-TEM)
Submitted: September 24, 2013 Decided: September 26, 2013
Before NIEMEYER and THACKER, Circuit Judges, HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sheila E. Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Elaine Inman Hogan, Howard
W. Martin, Jr., CRENSHAW WARE & MARTIN, PLC, Norfolk, Virginia;
Jocelyn Renee Cuttino, MORGAN LEWIS & BOCKIUS, LLP, Washington,
D.C., for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Sheila E. Brown appeals the district court’s order
dismissing her civil action. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. Berkley
Staffing, LLC, No. 2:12-cv-00564-MSD-TEM (E.D. Va. Feb. 4,
2013). We deny Berkley Staffing, LLC’s motion to strike Brown’s
informal brief. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.