Robert M. Cox; Cherie M. Cox v. Judy McMahon

13-1284Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit23.04.2013

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1284
ROBERT M. COX; CHERIE M. COX,
Plaintiffs – Appellants,
v.
JUDY MCMAHON; PAUL GARFINKEL; JOCELYN CATE; GREG FORMAN;
DEBORAH LEWIS; STUART FELDMAN; PAUL SCHWARTZ,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Arenda Wright Allen, District
Judge. (2:12-cv-00689-AWA-LRL)
Submitted: April 18, 2013 Decided: April 23, 2013
Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert M. Cox, Cherie M. Cox, Appellants Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Robert and Cherie Cox appeal the district court’s
order dismissing their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record
and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss
the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Cox v.
McMahon, No. 2:12-cv-00689-AWA-LRL (E.D. Va. Jan. 10, 14, & 31,
2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.