Banoro Garrett v. the Norfolk Police Department

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1092
BANORO GARRETT,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
THE NORFOLK POLICE DEPARTMENT; THE NORFOLK SHERIFF’S
OFFICE; THE CITY OF NORFOLK; LIEUTENANT R. H. WEILER;
SERGEANT R. D. LEWIS; OFFICER D. A. PACIFICO; OFFICER H. G.
WHITE; ROBERT J. MCCABE; LIEUTENANT BONILLA; SERGEANT G.
SNYDER; DEPUTY TAYLOR; M/DEPUTY A. MEARS; L. WILLIS; P.
BELL; J. CUMMINS, L.P.N.; J. KIDD; DARRELL HILL,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (2:12-cv-00295-RAJ-LRL)
Submitted: March 28, 2013 Decided: April 2, 2013
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Banoro Garrett, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa H. Leiner, HARMAN,
CLAYTOR, CORRIGAN & WELLMAN, Richmond, Virginia; Melvin Wayne
Ringer, CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Norfolk, Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Banoro Garrett seeks to appeal the district court’s
order dismissing some Defendants from his 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(2006) action. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over
final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory
and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P.
54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541,
545-46 (1949). The order Garrett seeks to appeal is neither a
final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --