Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
12-8015•Michael Tyrone Gallagher v. Deputy Codfeller
12-8015Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit25.01.2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-8015
MICHAEL TYRONE GALLAGHER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DEPUTY CODFELLER; BRANDON, DEPUTY; HARPER, CAPTAIN; DEPUTY
JOHNSON; DEPUTY DISMUKE; GARRISON, CAPTAIN; LOWRY, CAPTAIN;
SMITH, LT.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief
District Judge. (2:11-cv-00181-RBS-DEM)
Submitted: January 22, 2013 Decided: January 25, 2013
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Tyrone Gallagher, Appellant Pro Se. Grant Edward
Kronenberg, MORRIS & MORRIS, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Michael Tyrone Gallagher appeals the district court’s
order granting the Respondents’ motion to dismiss his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2006) complaint for failure to state a claim. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Gallagher v. Codfeller, No. 2:11-cv-00181-RBS-DEM (E.D. Va. Oct.
31, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.