Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
12-7947•Darryl L. Cook v. United States of America
12-7947Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit20.06.2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7947
DARRYL L. COOK,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 12-7980
DARRYL L. COOK,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District
of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Richard M. Gergel, District
Judge. (0:11-cv-00320-RMG); Mary G. Lewis, District Judge.
(0:12-cv-00216-MGL)
Submitted: April 19, 2013 Decided: June 20, 2013
Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Darryl L. Cook, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens,
Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
In No. 12-7947, federal prisoner Darryl L. Cook
appeals the district court’s orders accepting the
recommendations of the magistrate judge and denying relief in an
action claiming several violations of the Federal Tort Claims
Act (FTCA). In No. 12-7980, Cook appeals the district court’s
order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing as duplicative a second action brought pursuant to
the FTCA. We have reviewed the records and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Cook v. United States, Nos. 0:11-cv-00320-RMG;
0:12-cv-00216-MGL (D.S.C. Feb. 6, 2012; Nov. 1 & 7, 2012). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.