Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
12-7784•Samuel Lamont Whitner v. Disciplinary Counsel Lesley M. Coggiola; Staff Attorney Tiffany N. Richardson
12-7784Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit25.01.2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7784
SAMUEL LAMONT WHITNER,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL LESLEY M. COGGIOLA; STAFF ATTORNEY
TIFFANY N. RICHARDSON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District
Judge. (3:12-cv-01876-CMC)
Submitted: January 22, 2013 Decided: January 25, 2013
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Samuel Lamont Whitner, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Samuel Lamont Whitner appeals the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing Whitner’s civil action. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Whitner v. Disciplinary
Counsel Lesley M. Coggiola, No. 3:12-cv-01876-CMC (D.S.C.
Sept. 13, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.