Isaac Woods v. SARA REVELL, Warden

12-7681Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit21.02.2013

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7681
ISAAC WOODS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
SARA REVELL, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:11-hc-02134-BO)
Submitted: February 8, 2013 Decided: February 21, 2013
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Isaac Woods, Appellant Pro Se. Christina Ann Kelley, BUREAU OF
PRISONS, Butner, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Isaac Lee Woods appeals the district court’s orders
and judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) petition and
denying his motion for reconsideration. We affirm for the
reasons cited by the district court. See Woods v. Revell, No.
5:11-hc-02134-BO (E.D.N.C. July 25, 2012; Aug. 14, 2012).
Insofar as Woods claims he was denied notice that the court
would construe the Government’s motion as a motion for summary
judgment, we note that the motion clearly stated it was a
summary judgment motion. In addition, Woods was given timely
notice of his right to respond to the motion and the
consequences if he failed to adequately do so.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders and
judgment. We grant Woods’ motion for leave to proceed in forma
pauperis and deny his motion to strike. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.