United States of America v. Pedro F. Hill, a/k/a Pedro Falcon Hill

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7485
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
PEDRO F. HILL, a/k/a Pedro Falcon Hill,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior
District Judge. (3:07-cr-00028-REP-1)
Submitted: January 16, 2013 Decided: March 6, 2013
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Pedro F. Hill, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Childs Ackley, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Pedro Falcon Hill appeals the district court’s order
denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a reduction
of sentence based on Amendment 750 to the U.S. Sentencing
Guidelines Manual (2011). We have reviewed the record and
conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in
denying the motion. See United States v. Stewart, 595 F.3d 197,
200 (4th Cir. 2010) (standard of review). Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United
States v. Hill, No. 3:07-cr-00028-REP-1 (E.D. Va. Aug. 22,
2012). Furthermore, we deny Hill’s motion to appoint counsel.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --