Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
12-7385•United States of America v. Linwood Batts, Jr.
12-7385Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit18.12.2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7385
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
LINWOOD BATTS, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:07-cr-00064-FL-1)
Submitted: December 13, 2012 Decided: December 18, 2012
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Linwood Batts, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May-Parker,
Ethan A. Ontjes, Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh,
North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Linwood Batts, Jr., appeals the district court’s order
denying for lack of jurisdiction his motion seeking an extension
of time to file a motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.
2012). On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in
the appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Batts’
informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district
court’s disposition, Batts has forfeited appellate review of the
court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.