Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
12-7034•United States of America v. Keiron Wayne Bryant
12-7034Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit26.11.2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7034
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
KEIRON WAYNE BRYANT,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Arenda Wright Allen, District
Judge. (2:05-cr-00082-AWA-JEB-1)
Submitted: November 20, 2012 Decided: November 26, 2012
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and FLOYD, Circuit
Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Keiron Wayne Bryant, Appellant Pro Se. Darryl James Mitchell,
Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Keiron Wayne Bryant appeals the district court’s order
denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion to reduce his
sentence pursuant to Amendment 750 to the U.S. Sentencing
Guidelines Manual (2010). We have reviewed the record and
conclude the district court properly found it lacked the
authority to reduce Bryant’s 120-month sentence, which was the
statutory mandatory minimum. See United States v. Munn, 595
F.3d 183, 187 (4th Cir. 2010) (“[A] defendant who was convicted
of a crack offense but sentenced pursuant to a mandatory
statutory minimum sentence is ineligible for a reduction under
§ 3582(c)(2).”). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. See United States v. Bryant, No. 2:05-
cr-00082-AWA-JEB-1 (E.D. Va. May 30, 2012). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.