Matthew Spencer O’brien v. Mr. Summerfield

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6812
MATTHEW SPENCER O’BRIEN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MR. SUMMERFIELD,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
DR. BROOKS; BOBBY P. SHEARIN; J. MICHAEL STOUFFER; SCOTT S.
OAKLEY,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Ellen Lipton Hollander, District Judge.
(1:11-cv-02346-ELH)
Submitted: August 16, 2012 Decided: August 21, 2012
Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Matthew Spencer O’Brien, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Christopher
Costello, WHARTON, LEVIN, EHRMANTRAUT, KLEIN & NASH, Annapolis,
Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Matthew Spencer O’Brien appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. O’Brien v. Summerfield, No. 1:11-cv-02346-ELH (D. Md.
Feb. 21, 2012; Apr. 5, 2012). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --