Randy Drummond v. Dr. Bearden; Medical Corp Inc

12-6778Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit21.08.2012

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6778
RANDY DRUMMOND,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DR. BEARDEN; MEDICAL CORP INC,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
JON E. OZMINT, Director of South Carolina Dept of Correction;
JENNY ARDIS, Administrative Coordinator of Division of Health
Services; DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge.
(8:10-cv-02423-TLW)
Submitted: July 31, 2012 Decided: August 21, 2012
Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Randy Drummond, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Michael Pruitt,
MCDONALD, PATRICK, TINSLEY, BAGGETT & POSTON, Greenwood, South
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Randy Drummond appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to amend his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006)
complaint after entry of judgment. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the
district court’s order. See Drummond v. Ozmint, No. 8:10-cv-
02423-TLW (D.S.C. Apr. 17, 2012; Feb. 17, 2012; Dec. 5, 2011).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.