Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
12-6541•James Harold Williams v. Jon Ozmint
12-6541Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit24.08.2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6541
JAMES HAROLD WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JON OZMINT; ANNIE MAE SELLERS; CECILIA R. REYNOLDS; PAMELA
PHELPS; A. HARDIN, Inmate Grievance Administration; DENNIS
PATTERSON, SCDC Operations Coordinator; BEVERLY BAKER, SCDC
Office of General Counsel,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. Margaret B. Seymour, Chief
District Judge. (4:10-cv-02355-MBS)
Submitted: August 22, 2012 Decided: August 24, 2012
Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Harold Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Nikole H. Boland,
RILEY, POPE & LANEY, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
James Harold Williams appeals the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Williams v. Ozmint, No. 4:10-cv-02355-MBS (D.S.C. Feb.
21, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.