Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
12-6369•United States of America v. Kelvin Bernard Tyler, a/k/a Punkin, a/k/a Punk
12-6369Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit26.06.2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6369
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
KELVIN BERNARD TYLER, a/k/a Punkin, a/k/a Punk,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Margaret B. Seymour, Chief
District Judge. (5:04-cr-00964-MBS-1)
Submitted: June 21, 2012 Decided: June 26, 2012
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kelvin Bernard Tyler, Appellant Pro Se. Stacey Denise Haynes,
Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Kelvin Bernard Tyler appeals the district court’s
order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for reduction in
sentence. We have reviewed the records and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. United States v. Tyler, No. 5:04-cr-00964-MBS-1
(D.S.C. Feb. 16, 2012). We deny Tyler’s motion for transcripts
at government expense. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.