Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
12-2457•CHARLES R. MAJOR, JR., a/k/a Charles R. Major v. Mr. Mike Raymond, sued individually
12-2457Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit04.06.2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-2457
CHARLES R. MAJOR, JR., a/k/a Charles R. Major,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MR. MIKE RAYMOND, sued individually and in working capacity;
HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF GREENVILLE; MS. MARIAN
TODD, sued individually and in working capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (6-12-cv-00183-GRA)
Submitted: May 30, 2013 Decided: June 4, 2013
Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles R. Major, Appellant Pro Se. Emily T. Whitney, DEVLIN &
PARKINSON, PA, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Charles R. Major, Jr., appeals the district court’s
orders adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and
dismissing his civil complaint, and denying his subsequent
motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Major v. Raymond, No.
6:12-cv-00183-GRA (D.S.C. Sept. 28, 2012; Oct. 23, 2012). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.