Elliott Haines, Iii v. PATRICK A. DONAHOE, Postmaster General of the United States

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-2325
ELLIOTT HAINES, III,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PATRICK A. DONAHOE, Postmaster General of the United States,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge.
(1:10-cv-00293-ELH)
Submitted: August 22, 2013 Decided: August 26, 2013
Before MOTZ, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Elliott Haines, III, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Harold Barnard,
Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Elliott Haines, III, appeals the district court’s
order granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment on
Haines’ retaliation-based hostile work environment claim under
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and his gender discrimination
claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Haines
v. Donahoe, No. 1:10-cv-00293-ELH (D. Md. filed Aug. 20, 2012;
entered Aug. 21, 2012). We further deny Haines’ motion for
appointment of counsel and deny as moot his motion to place this
appeal in abeyance for the Supreme Court’s decision in Vance v.
Ball State Univ., 133 S. Ct. 2434 (2013). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --