Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
12-2179•Stephen J. Guidetti, a/k/a Stephen John Guidetti, a/k/a Stephen John, Stephen-John v. Donahue, aka, dba, Deputy Sheriff Sgt, Employee of Corporation, aka, dba, Sheriff…
12-2179Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit24.01.2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-2179
STEPHEN J. GUIDETTI, a/k/a Stephen John Guidetti, a/k/a
Stephen John, Stephen-John; son of God,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DONAHUE, aka, dba, Deputy Sheriff Sgt, Employee of
Corporation, aka, dba, Sheriff Department; ALEX R. PAYNE,
aka, dba, Deputy Sheriff, Employee of Corporation, aka, dba,
Sheriff Department; JOHN DOES 1 - 10, address unknown at
this time; JANE DOES 1 - 10, address unknown at this time,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
GREENVILLE COUNTY, aka, dba, Corporation Unknown; SHERIFF
DEPARTMENT, aka, dba, Corporation, aka, dba, Greenville
County of; GREENVILLE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, aka, dba,
Sheriff Department, aka, dba, Greenville County of, aka,
dba, Corporation; STEVE LOFTIS, aka, dba, Sheriff, aka, dba,
Employee of Corporation, aka, dba, Greenville County
Sheriff; HEATHERLY BROTHERS AUTO PARTS & WRECKER SERVICE,
aka, dba, Corporation; JIM HEATHERLY, aka, dba, Corporation,
aka, dba, Heatherly Owner-President Brothers Auto Parts &
Wrecker Service; JOHN DOE 1, Employee for Heatherly Brothers
Auto Parts & Wrecker Service; W. WALTER WILKS, Greenville
County Attorney; GREENVILLE COUNTY COUNCIL; KNOX WHITE,
Mayor; LILLIAN BROCK FLEMMING, Vice Mayor District 2; JOE
DILL, District 17 Councilmember; JOSEPH BALDWIN, District 18
Councilmember; WILLS MEADOWS, District 19 Councilmember; SID
CATES, District 20 Councilmember; JIM BURNS, District 21
Councilmember; BOB TAYLOR, District 22 Councilmember;
XANTHENE NORRIS, District 23 Councilmember; LIZ SEMAN,
District 24 Councilmember; LOTTIE GIBSON, District 25
Councilmember; DAN RAWLS, District 26 Councilmember; BUTCH
KIRVEN, District 27 Councilmember; FRED PAYNE, District 28
-- 1 of 4 --
2
Councilmember; CHARLES R. GARRETT, aka, dba, Judge Charles R
Garrett, Chick Springs Summery Court; CHICK SPRINGS SUMMERY
COURT, aka, dba, Corporation, Taylors, SC; S. B. KEATOR,
aka, dba, Judge S B Keator, Greenville, SC,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (6:11-cv-01249-HMH)
Submitted: January 22, 2013 Decided: January 24, 2013
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Stephen J. Guidetti, Appellant Pro Se. Russell W. Harter, Jr.,
CHAPMAN, HARTER & GROVES, PA, Greenville, South Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 4 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Stephen John Guidetti appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.
The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge
pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(b)(1)(B) (West 2006 & Supp. 2012).
The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and
advised Guidetti that failure to file timely, specific
objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review
of a district court order based upon the recommendation.
The timely filing of specific objections to a
magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve
appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when
the parties have been warned of the consequences of
noncompliance. Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th
Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985).
Guidetti has waived appellate review by failing to file specific
objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we grant
Guidetti leave to proceed in forma pauperis, affirm the judgment
of the district court, and dismiss Guidetti’s motion to suppress
testimony.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
-- 3 of 4 --
4
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 4 of 4 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.