H. Leighton Laskey v. State of Maryland

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1717
H. LEIGHTON LASKEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
STATE OF MARYLAND; CITY OF BALTIMORE; BALTIMORE CITY POLICE
DEPARTMENT; BALTIMORE CITY FALSE ALARM REDUCTION PROGRAM;
BALTIMORE CITY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT; JOSEPH B. JOHNSON, Program Manager,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. James K. Bredar, District Judge.
(1:12-cv-00945-JKB)
Submitted: August 16, 2012 Decided: August 20, 2012
Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
H. Leighton Laskey, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
H. Leighton Laskey appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction
and under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error.* Accordingly, we affirm
the district court’s judgment. Laskey v. Maryland, No.
1:12-cv-00945-JKB (D. Md. May 23, 2012). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* Although Laskey’s pleadings reference the Equal Protection
Clause and the Fourteenth Amendment Privileges and Immunities
Clause, we conclude his pleadings fall far short of establishing
a cognizable claim under either clause.

-- 2 of 2 --