Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
12-1636•Raymond R. Henderson v. Vasco, Inc.
12-1636Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit11.10.2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1636
RAYMOND R. HENDERSON,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
VASCO, INC.; ABBOTT'S AUTO SERVICE; EXPEDITED SHIPPING
SOLUTIONS; SUBCONTRACTING CONCEPTS, INC.; TECH PARTS
EXPRESS; QUALITY AUTOMOTIVE WAREHOUSE, INC.; FACTORY PARTS;
UCI WAREHOUSE, CORP.; LABOR FINDERS OF VIRGINIA, INC.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:12-cv-00244-HEH)
Submitted: September 25, 2012 Decided: October 11, 2012
Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Raymond R. Henderson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Raymond R. Henderson appeals the district court’s
order dismissing this action for want of subject matter
jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P.
12(h)(3). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Henderson v. Vasco, Inc., No. 3:12-cv-00244-HEH
(E.D. Va. Apr. 12, 2012). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.