Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
12-1572•Brenda C. Altman v. John McHugh
12-1572Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit13.09.2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1572
BRENDA C. ALTMAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JOHN MCHUGH,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS; PAUL J.
ROSENSTEEL; CARROLL B. CORRELL; MONIQUE KORN; CHARLES COX,
Colonel; FRANK MILLER, Colonel; ANTHONY NIDA, Colonel;
NICHOLAS KOLAR, LTC; COLONEL DONALD WYNN, Commander; WAYNE
E. HENRY; CECIL HUTCHINSON,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Michael F. Urbanski,
District Judge. (5:11-cv-00061-MFU)
Submitted: August 31, 2012 Decided: September 13, 2012
Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Brenda C. Altman, Appellant Pro Se. Rick A. Mountcastle, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Brenda C. Altman appeals the district court’s order
dismissing her employment discrimination complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Altman v. McHugh, No. 5:11-cv-00061-MFU (W.D. Va. Apr. 9, 2012).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.