Abdelmalek Haidar v. PATRICK R. DONAHOE, Postmaster General

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1561
ABDELMALEK HAIDAR,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PATRICK R. DONAHOE, Postmaster General,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, Senior
District Judge. (1:11-cv-01013-TSE-IDD)
Submitted: August 22, 2012 Decided: August 24, 2012
Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Abdelmalek Haidar, Appellant Pro Se. Dennis Carl Barghaan, Jr.,
Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Abdelmalek Haidar appeals the district court’s order
granting the Defendant summary judgment on his employment
discrimination complaint under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act
of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-2000-e-17 (West 2003 & Supp. 2010).
On appeal, Haidar fails to present any argument challenging the
district court’s judgment, stating: “All the clarifications are
in my previous file with the district court.” Accordingly,
Haidar has waived appellate review of the district court’s
order. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b) (directing appealing parties to
present specific arguments in informal brief and limiting review
to issues raised in informal brief); Wahi v. Charleston Area
Med. Ctr., Inc., 562 F.3d 599, 607 (4th Cir. 2009) (limiting
appellate review to arguments raised in brief in accordance with
Fed. R. Civ. P. 28(a)(9)(A)).
We therefore affirm the district court’s judgment. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --