Dennis Croft v. City of Roanoke, Virginia

12-1513Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit24.01.2013

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1513
DENNIS CROFT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Chief
District Judge. (7:11-cv-00277-GEC-RSB)
Submitted: December 27, 2012 Decided: January 24, 2013
Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John M. Loeschen, JOHN M. LOESCHEN LAW OFFICES, Roanoke,
Virginia, for Appellant. Timothy Ross Spencer, OFFICE OF THE
CITY ATTORNEY FOR THE CITY OF ROANOKE, Roanoke, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Dennis Croft, a former captain with the City of
Roanoke Fire/EMS Department, appeals the district court’s order
granting the City of Roanoke’s motion for summary judgment and
dismissing his employment discrimination complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm the judgment for the reasons stated by the district
court in its memorandum opinion. See Croft v. City of Roanoke,
Va., No. 7:11-cv-00277-GEC-RSB (W.D. Va. Mar. 22, 2012). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.