Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
12-1463•Ernest Franklin Coble, Jr. v. William J. Wilkins
12-1463Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit01.08.2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1463
ERNEST FRANKLIN COBLE, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WILLIAM J. WILKINS; INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE; EXAMINER
#0469241048; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr.,
Chief District Judge. (1:11-cv-00211-JAB-JEP)
Submitted: July 26, 2012 Decided: August 1, 2012
Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ernest Franklin Coble, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Kenneth L.
Greene, Supervisory Attorney, Sara Ann Ketchum, UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Ernest Franklin Coble, Jr., appeals the district
court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate
judge and dismissing his action brought pursuant to the Fair
Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692-1692p (2006).
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Coble v. Wilkins, No. 1:11-cv-00211-JAB-JEP (M.D.N.C.
Mar. 20, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.