Dr. Pepi Schafler v. SCOTT D. FIELD, Esq.

12-1430Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit01.08.2012

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1430
DR. PEPI SCHAFLER,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
SCOTT D. FIELD, Esq.; KENNETH OESTREICHER, Esq.; REZNICK,
FEDDER & SILVERMAN; WHITEFORD, TAYLOR & PRESTON; DENNIS D.
DAVIS, Esq.; RICHARD J. SPEAR, Esq.; GOLDBERG, STINNET et
al,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District
Judge. (8:12-cv-00715-PJM)
Submitted: July 26, 2012 Decided: August 1, 2012
Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Pepi Schafler, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Pepi Schafler appeals the district court’s order
dismissing her complaint alleging civil conspiracy. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Schafler v. Field, No. 8:12-cv-00715-PJM (D. Md. Mar. 20, 2012).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.