Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
12-1422•Dinh Tran v. Coty Inc.
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1422
DINH TRAN,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
COTY INC.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard,
Senior District Judge. (5:10-cv-00431-H)
Submitted: July 25, 2012 Decided: August 1, 2012
Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dinh Tran, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Scott Joyner, OGLETREE,
DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Dinh Tran appeals the district court’s order denying
his motions for reconsideration of the denial of his complaint
alleging discrimination and retaliation. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Tran v. Coty, Inc.,
No. 5:10-cv-00431-H (E.D.N.C. Mar. 13, 2012). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.