Tania Baker v. LOUIS E. WOOLARD, LCSWC-C; MARY ELLEN CAHILL, Intake Specialist; EVELYN YAP, LCSWC-C

12-1376Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit30.05.2012

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1376
TANIA BAKER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
LOUIS E. WOOLARD, LCSWC-C; MARY ELLEN CAHILL, Intake
Specialist; EVELYN YAP, LCSWC-C,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge.
(1:11-cv-02484-CCB)
Submitted: May 24, 2012 Decided: May 30, 2012
Before MOTZ and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tania Baker, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Tania Baker appeals the district court’s order denying
her motion for reconsideration under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Baker v. Woolard, No. 1:11-cv-02484-CCB (D. Md. Mar. 7,
2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.