Vicki A. Lindsey v. Highwoods Realty Limited Partnership

12-1223Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit23.07.2012

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1223
VICKI A. LINDSEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HIGHWOODS REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; HRLP NC VA, L.P.;
HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INCORPORATED; WESTERN INDUSTRIES-
SOUTH, LLC,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
JOHN DOE #1,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:11-cv-00447-HEH-DJN)
Submitted: July 19, 2012 Decided: July 23, 2012
Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Vicki A. Lindsey, Appellant Pro Se. Alison Wright Feehan, KUTAK
ROCK LLP, Richmond, Virginia; Janeen Beth Koch, KALBAUGH, PFUND
& MESSERSMITH, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Vicki A. Lindsey appeals from the district court’s
orders granting summary judgment for the defendants in her
action alleging premises liability and negligent application of
a banned substance. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Lindsey v. Highwoods Realty Ltd. P’ship,
No. 3:11-cv-00447-HEH-DJN (E.D. Va. Feb. 3, 2012 & Apr. 4,
2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.