Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
12-1162•Whitney Lassiter v. Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.
12-1162Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit21.06.2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1162
WHITNEY LASSITER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HUNTINGTON INGALLS INDUSTRIES, INC.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News. Raymond A. Jackson,
District Judge. (4:11-cv-00101-RAJ-DEM)
Submitted: June 11, 2012 Decided: June 21, 2012
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Whitney Lassiter, Appellant Pro Se. Scott William Kezman, Mark
Edward Warmbier, KAUFMAN & CANOLES, PC, Norfolk, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Whitney Lassiter appeals the district court’s orders
granting summary judgment and dismissing her claims and denying
her motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Lassiter v. Huntington
Ingalls Indus., Inc., No. 4:11-cv-00101-RAJ-DEM (E.D. Va. Jan.
10, 2012). We grant Lassiter’s motion to proceed in forma
pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.