Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
12-1075•Thomas E. Gust v. Us Airways; Us Airways Payroll/garnishments Services
12-1075Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit30.04.2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1075
THOMAS E. GUST,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
US AIRWAYS; US AIRWAYS PAYROLL/GARNISHMENTS SERVICES,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger,
District Judge. (1:11-cv-00133-MR-DLH)
Submitted: April 26, 2012 Decided: April 30, 2012
Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas E. Gust, Appellant Pro Se. Evan M. Sauda, SMITH MOORE
LEATHERWOOD LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Thomas E. Gust appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing for failure to state a claim his suit against his
former employer, U.S. Airways and U.S. Airways
Payroll/Garnishments Services, for recovery of wages and
withheld in accordance with a tax lien and damages arising
therefrom. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Gust v. U.S. Airways, No. 1:11-cv-00133-MR-DLH
(W.D.N.C. Dec. 27, 2011). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.