United States of America v. Lino H. Haynes

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-7725
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
LINO H. HAYNES,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr.,
Senior District Judge. (2:90-cr-00105-HCM-TEM-1)
Submitted: March 15, 2012 Decided: March 20, 2012
Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lino H. Haynes, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart,
Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia; Neil H.
MacBride, United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Lino H. Haynes appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for correction of judgment under Fed. R.
Crim. P. 36. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. United States v. Haynes, No.
2:90-cr-00105-HCM-TEM-1 (E.D. Va. Nov. 23, 2011). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --