Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
11-7717•Timothy A. Jones v. C. W. MITCHELL, Superintendent, Haynesville Correctional Unit 17; JANE DOE; JOHN DOE
11-7717Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit30.04.2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-7717
TIMOTHY A. JONES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
C. W. MITCHELL, Superintendent, Haynesville Correctional
Unit #17; JANE DOE; JOHN DOE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District
Judge. (3:11-cv-00594-JRS)
Submitted: April 26, 2012 Decided: April 30, 2012
Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Timothy A. Jones, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Timothy A. Jones appeals the district court’s order
dismissing without prejudice his civil suit because Jones did
not return a completed in forma pauperis affidavit form and
consent to collection of fees form and he did not pay the
statutory filing fee. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Jones v. Mitchell, No. 3:11-cv-00594-JRS
(E.D. Va. Nov. 18, 2011). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.