Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
11-7679•United States of America v. Lendro Michael Thomas
11-7679Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit30.04.2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-7679
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
LENDRO MICHAEL THOMAS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District
Judge. (1:03-cr-00189-JFM-1)
Submitted: April 26, 2012 Decided: April 30, 2012
Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lendro Michael Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. John Francis Purcell,
Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Lendro Michael Thomas appeals the district court’s
order denying Thomas’ Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(a) motion to correct
his sentence, which was imposed in May of 2005. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm. United States v. Thomas, No. 1:03-cr-00189-JFM-1 (D.
Md. Nov. 30, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.