Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
11-7627•Paul Julius Fletcher v. JOHN R. OWEN, Warden
11-7627Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit28.02.2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-7627
PAUL JULIUS FLETCHER,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
JOHN R. OWEN, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Aiken. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (1:11-cv-01334-JFA)
Submitted: February 23, 2012 Decided: February 28, 2012
Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Paul Julius Fletcher, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Paul Julius Fletcher, a prisoner incarcerated in a
federal institution pursuant to his conviction in the District
of Columbia Superior Court, appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2011)
petition for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. See Fletcher v. Owen, No.
11:1-cv-01334-JFA (D.S.C. Nov. 29, 2011). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.