Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
11-7501•David Atkins v. KATHY SCHWARTZ, Head Nurse; RN; DONALD W. FARLEY, Sheriff
11-7501Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit28.02.2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-7501
DAVID ATKINS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
KATHY SCHWARTZ, Head Nurse; RN; DONALD W. FARLEY, Sheriff,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Chief
District Judge. (7:11-cv-00493-GEC-RSB)
Submitted: February 23, 2012 Decided: February 28, 2012
Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Atkins, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
David Atkins appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny Atkins’ motion for a transcript at
Government expense and affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Atkins v. Schwartz, No. 7:11-cv-00493-GEC-RSB
(W.D. Va. Oct. 31, 2011). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.