Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
11-7472•Joe Faulks v. DEPUTY GUILMARTIN, Sergeant; DEPUTY COX, Corporal; DEPUTY KIDD, Hearing Officer
11-7472Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit14.02.2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-7472
JOE FAULKS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DEPUTY GUILMARTIN, Sergeant; DEPUTY COX, Corporal; DEPUTY
KIDD, Hearing Officer,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District
Judge. (2:11-cv-00551-MSD-TEM)
Submitted: February 9, 2012 Decided: February 14, 2012
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joe Faulks, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Joe Faulks appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his complaint for failing to state a claim. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Faulks v. Guilmartin, No. 2:11-cv-00551-MSD-TEM (E.D. Va. Oct.
19, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.